review · Annals of Medicine and Surgery
This manuscript provides an outlook on using cognitive enhancers and their ethical implications. Cognitive enhancers, including prescription medications like modafinil and methylphenidate, over-the-counter supplements such as ginseng and caffeine, and novel nootropic agents like gene therapy and stem cell interventions, improve cognitive functions such as memory, focus, and learning. While they have shown efficacy in treating neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's disease and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), their growing use by healthy individuals raises ethical concerns. This paper addresses the benefits of cognitive enhancers, such as improved academic and professional performance, and the associated risks, including addiction, dependence, and long-term health consequences. It also delves into social and ethical issues, including disparities in access, fairness, coercion in competitive environments, and distinguishing between genuine and substance-enhanced achievements. Additionally, the paper examines current regulations and proposes stronger legal frameworks to address the increasing use of cognitive enhancers. In conclusion, while cognitive enhancers have potential therapeutic benefits, a balanced approach is needed to regulate their use and ensure they are not misused to gain unfair advantages, particularly in non-medical settings.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000003442
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.