MARATTO

review · International Journal of Environmental Health Research

Exploring adenovirus in water environments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

202326 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Douala

In plain language

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 239 studies investigated the presence of adenoviruses across global water environments. The overall prevalence of the virus was found to be 59.2 per cent across all tested sources. Adenoviruses were most common in wastewater, appearing in 83.1 per cent of untreated samples and 75.3 per cent of treated samples. They were also detected in surface water, drinking water, and groundwater, with both human and animal strains present. However, because the majority of evaluated studies did not assess whether the detected viruses were viable and infectious, the precise health risks associated with contamination remain uncertain. Despite this limitation, the results indicate that water environments, including drinking water supplies, represent a potentially significant transmission route in both developed and developing economies.

Key takeaways

  • Adenoviruses showed an overall prevalence of 59.2 per cent across diverse global water sources.
  • Prevalence reached 83.1 per cent in untreated wastewater, 75.3 per cent in treated wastewater, and 22.7 per cent in drinking water.
  • Both human and animal adenoviruses were detected in water environments.
  • Most evaluated studies did not assess viral viability, leaving the direct link between water contamination and infection risk weakly supported.

Why it matters

Adenoviruses cause widespread human and animal infections, and their frequent detection in treated wastewater and drinking water raises public health concerns. Understanding how commonly these viruses occur in water supplies helps water management authorities and health organisations recognise potential transmission pathways and identify where current monitoring fails to confirm whether detected viruses are actually infectious.

Commercialisation angle

This early-stage epidemiological evidence could inform water utilities and public health agencies seeking to evaluate water safety and treatment efficacy. The finding that most studies fail to assess viral viability highlights a clear gap for developers of viability-testing assays and monitoring tools. However, the abstract provides review data rather than an applied tool or prototype, placing direct commercial applications at an early stage.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Adenoviruses (AdVs) have a significant impact in both medical and environmental contexts. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of AdV in different water types, such as untreated and treated wastewater, surface water, groundwater, drinking water, and other water matrices. A total of 239 articles were included in this meta-analysis. Adenoviruses were detected in various waters worldwide. The overall prevalence in water was found to be 59.2%, with the highest prevalence in untreated wastewater (83.1%) and treated wastewater (75.3%), followed by "other water matrices" (53.4%), surface water (49.5%) drinking water (22.7%), and groundwater (18.5%). Most of the studies did not assess the viability of the viruses, leading to weak links between water contamination and risk. Both human and animal AdV were found in water environments. The findings suggest that water, including drinking water, could be a significant route of AdV transmission in both developed and developing economies.

Research topics

  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Respiratory viral infections research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2023.2255559

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.