article · BMC Artificial Intelligence
Background Skin-manifesting neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) pose significant diagnostic challenges due to overlapping clinical presentations and limited access to specialist care in endemic regions. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in dermatological diagnosis; however, concerns remain regarding algorithmic bias, reduced accuracy in darker skin tones, and lack of transparency in decision-making. Aim This review aimed to synthesise existing evidence on explainable AI approaches for the differential diagnosis of skin-manifesting NTDs, with emphasis on performance, equity across dark skin tones, and clinical applicability. Methods A structured narrative review was conducted using systematic search methods across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, AJOL, and ScienceDirect. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed AI-based diagnostic research involving skin conditions that incorporated explainability or interpretability methods. Literature published between 2015 and 2025 was screened and synthesised thematically. Results Evidence from studies demonstrated that deep learning models achieve high diagnostic performance in dermatology (often > 85% accuracy), but consistently underperform in darker skin tones, with reported reductions of up to 20%. Explainable AI techniques such as saliency maps, Grad-CAM, and confidence scoring were shown to enhance interpretability and support differential diagnosis, though limitations related to dataset diversity and real-world deployment persist. Conclusion Explainable AI represents a critical advancement for equitable and reliable diagnosis of skin-manifesting NTDs. Addressing dataset bias, embedding transparency, and aligning AI tools with frontline workflows are essential to maximise clinical and public health impact. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s44398-026-00033-w
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.