MARATTO

article · Case Studies in Construction Materials

Experimental and numerical analysis of deep beams with openings strengthened with galvanized corrugated and flat steel sheets

202427 citationsOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

Abstract

This study investigates the behavior of deep reinforced concrete beams with openings strengthened using galvanized corrugated steel sheets (GCSS) and galvanized flat steel sheets (GFSS). An experimental program was conducted on ten deep beam specimens with different opening configurations, strengthened by externally bonded GCSS and GFSS around the openings. The key test parameters are different types of galvanized steel sheets (corrugated and flat) and different opening configurations (circular and square) with different opening sizes. It is found that the application of galvanized steel alters the mode of failure of the strengthened beams compared to the unstrengthened beam which failed due to premature shear failure. The deep beams strengthened with galvanized steel sheets exhibited higher initial stiffness, energy absorption capacity, and ultimate loads compared to the control beam. Finite element modeling (FEM) using ABAQUS software was performed to simulate their experimental behavior and the prediction accuracy is examined against the test results. A parametric study using the validated FEM is carried out to examine the influence of the thickness of the galvanized plates and opening size ratio on the shear strength of the deep beams. The findings reveal that shear strength increases with the increase of the plate thickness and an opening ratio of 0.33 is recommended for practical applications of deep beams strengthened with galvanized steel sheets.

Research topics

  • Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03522

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.