article · Discover Social Science and Health
This study aimed to explore patients’ experiences and preferences while receiving bad news in Ethiopian state hospitals. This qualitative study involved thematic analysis of in-depth interviews. Physicians and patients from two comprehensive hospitals with large patient populations were selected using snowball sampling techniques to identify those who had received bad news. Major findings on patients’ preferences for receiving bad news include: patients want their physicians to be honest and provide clear, straightforward information when delivering bad news, patients appreciate it when their physician shows empathy and compassion, patients prefer to received bad news alone or without a family member, and patients want their physician to give them enough time to process the information and ask questions. Patients value follow-up communication from their physician after delivering bad news to address any concerns or questions they may have. The study’s findings shed light on patients’ preferences and coping strategies when receiving bad news. Patients strongly advocate for face-to-face discussions in a private and calm environment, where physicians can effectively communicate their diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment options. Patients highly value physicians who are honesty, and provide clear information. Additionally, patients greatly appreciate empathy and compassion from their physicians, as it contributes to their overall experience.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s44155-024-00125-w
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.