book chapter · Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series
This study compares college students' adoption of chatbots for assignment assistance with traditional printed books. Objectives include analysing usage patterns, exploring motivations, identifying challenges, examining preferences, and gathering recommendations for chatbot enhancements in academic settings. A robust questionnaire was developed iteratively, including self-evaluation and a pilot study. Data was collected from 573 college students through Google Forms, ensuring diverse representation across academic years and fields of study. While students rely on printed books for assignments moderately, they are more inclined toward chatbots. Key motivations include technological curiosity (62.1%), quick information access (85.3%), and dissatisfaction with traditional methods (64.6%). Challenges include inaccuracies in chatbot responses (86.9%) and conversational limitations (81.2%). There's a clear preference for chatbots in various academic aspects, scoring significantly higher in convenience, speed, and overall impact.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2782-1.ch010
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.