article · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a valvular heart disease characterised by the narrowing of the valve opening area. Calcific aortic stenosis (CAS) and rheumatic aortic stenosis (RAS) have distinctly different valve morphologies. The haemodynamic environment of generic calcific and rheumatic aortic valves (AV) of various severities is analysed through the use of 3D FSI modelling techniques. For moderate (AVA = 1-15 cm<sup>2</sup>), severe (AVA < 1 cm<sup>2</sup>) and very severe (AVA ≪ 1 cm<sup>2</sup>) cases of calcific and rheumatic AS, larger TPGs with higher velocity magnitudes are estimated in the rheumatic cases compared to the calcific cases. The additional work required by the left ventricle to overcome the TPG caused by the moderate, severe and very severe rheumatic valve lesions are 5.6%, 42.0% and 58.3% higher compared to the calcific valves of the same severity. The clinical approximation of the TPG is determined according to the simplified Bernoulli approximation and compared to the ground-truth TPG from the FSI results. The insensitivity of the clinical TPG approximation to the type and severity of stenosis is evident. Overall, the clinical approximation of the TPG either over- or underpredicts the TPG depending on the type and severity of the lesion, with smaller errors in the rheumatic cases compared to the calcific cases.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.70156
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.