MARATTO

article · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Evaluation of Some Heavyweight Minerals as Sustainable Neutron and Gamma-Ray Attenuating Materials: Comprehensive Theoretical and Simulation Investigations

202411 citationsOpen accessBeni Suef University

Abstract

Abstract This study comprehensively evaluates the radiation attenuation efficiencies of hematite and barite, commonly used materials in radiation shielding, using theoretical and simulation investigations. The MCNP-5 code was used to obtain the linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) within the energy range of 0.015–15 MeV, with validation by the XCOM program. Based on these LAC values, various gamma-ray shielding parameters were determined: mass attenuation coefficient, half-value layer, radiation protection capacity, mean free path, transmission factor, and equivalent thickness to lead (ET Pb ). Additionally, effective atomic number (Z eff ) and electron density (N eff ) were calculated, including both single-energy and energy-dependent forms for photon absorption and interaction. Furthermore, MCNP-5 simulations and NGCal program calculations were used to assess thermal neutron attenuation, while the NXcom program determined fast neutron behavior. This analysis revealed superior γ-ray shielding for barite compared to hematite. Similarly, the NXcom program indicated better fast neutron shielding for barite. However, interestingly, simulations validated a 210% higher effectiveness in thermal neutron attenuation for hematite. Finally, comparing the studied materials with other shielding materials demonstrated promising potential as environmentally friendly alternatives for effective shielding against various radiation types.

Research topics

  • Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
  • Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s13369-024-09300-2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.