MARATTO

article · Environmental Technology

Evaluation of plant-based coagulants for turbidity removal and coagulant dosage prediction using machine learning

Abstract

This study investigates the use of six plant-based coagulants - <i>Acacia erioloba</i>, <i>Ricinodendron rautanenii</i>, <i>Schinziophyton rautanenii</i>, <i>Peltophorum africanum</i>, <i>Delonix regia</i>, and <i>Maerua angolensis</i> for the removal of turbidity from wastewater effluent. The coagulants were characterized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to determine morphological structure, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to assess chemical composition, and X-ray diffraction to analyse the molecular structure. The coagulation process was evaluated using jar tests with varying coagulant dosages and pH levels. SEM images revealed irregular, rough surfaces, with all materials being amorphous and non-crystalline. Significant levels of essential elements, including iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), sulphur (S), and potassium (K) were revealed. Turbidity removal efficiency fluctuated with pH, showing optimal results under alkaline conditions. Notably, strong negative correlations between pH and turbidity were observed for all coagulants except <i>Peltophorum africanum</i> at a dosage of 20 g/L. Doubling the coagulant volume achieved turbidity reductions between 59% and 92.24%, except for <i>Acacia erioloba</i> and <i>Ricinodendron rautanenii</i> at a dosage of 40 g/L, which showed increased turbidity. The study also employed machine learning techniques to analyse the data and predict the most effective coagulant dosage under different pH conditions. These findings suggest that plant-based coagulants could be viable alternatives to chemical coagulants, with machine learning providing accurate predictions of coagulation performance. Further research is recommended to explore the capabilities of these natural coagulants fully.

Research topics

  • Coagulation and Flocculation Studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2024.2439183

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.