article · The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal
Background Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most common knee injuries; with an estimated 200,000 injuries in the United States annually. ACL reconstruction is the gold standard for restoring knee stability to reduce the risk of secondary meniscal tears and symptomatic osteoarthritis. It requires either an autograft, allograft or artificial graft. Objective To evaluate the ankle and foot functions after harvesting in ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Patients and methods This prospective clinical study included 20 patients who underwent ACLR using the peroneus longus tendon as an autograft. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was used to assess the function of the foot and ankle after harvesting the peroneus longus tendon. The normal and the donor sides were compared. Results Three months postoperatively, the mean AOFAS score on the normal side was 100±0, while on the donor side, it ranged from 90 to 96 with a mean of 91.1±0.78 (highly statistically significant difference at P <0.001). At the same time, the mean dorsiflexion and plantar flexion on the normal side were 17.65±1.89 and 47.7±2.38, respectively. In contrast, on the donor side, the mean was 13.05±1.50 and 43.4±2.34 (highly statistically significant difference at P <0.001). At the 6-month follow-up examination, the mean AOFAS score on the normal side was 100±0, while on the donor side, it ranged from 98 to 100 with a mean of 99.7±0.95. (No statistically significant difference at P <0.001). Also, the mean dorsiflexion and plantar flexion on the donor side were 17.4±1.63 and 47.3±2.34, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion There was a statistically significant difference in the functional outcomes between the donor and the normal sides three months postoperatively. However, at a 6-month follow-up, both the donor and the normal side had nearly the same functional outcomes.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4103/eoj.eoj_105_24
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.