MARATTO

article · Ain Shams Journal of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology

Evaluation and Comparison of the Accuracy of Nolla and Demirjian Methods for Age Estimation in a Sample of Egyptian Children using Panoramic Radiographs (a Retrospective Study)

20241 citationOpen accessAin Shams University

Abstract

Background: Age estimation is a crucial step in forensics. For living this could be valuable in civil conflicts e.g., marriage, employment, military, and recruitment. Also, it is important in criminal cases involving rape, kidnapping, and illegal immigration. In cadavers, it could help in the identification of victims of mass disasters e.g., fires, crashes. Aim: The current study aimed at estimating the age of a sample of Egyptian children through using both Nolla and Demirjain methods, Comparing these ages with their chronological ages, and generating an equation that could be used to predict chronological age in both males and females and then assessing the accuracy of these methods. Materials & Methods: A retrospective study on dental panoramic radiographs of 180 children aged 4-16 years. The mean dental age (DA) according to the Demirjian and Nolla methods were compared to the mean chronological age (CA). Results: The mean CA of the study sample was 9.90±2.71y and 9.40±3.23y for females and males, respectively. Using the Demirjian method, the mean estimated DA was 9.38±2.09 years for females and 9.77±3.01years for males. For Nolla method, the mean estimated DA was 8.48±1.79 and 9.07±2.77years for females and males, respectively. The mean differences between the DA and CA according to the Demirjian were -0.52y and 0.37y for females and males, respectively. For Nolla method the mean differences were -1.42y and -0.33y. Conclusions: Nolla method was found to underestimate DA in Egyptian children, while the Demirjian method tends to overestimate it. But Nolla method showed more accuracy.

Research topics

  • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/ajfm.2024.293169.1140

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.