article · Agronomy
The tomato is a vital component of agriculture and is the second-most important vegetable globally. Maintaining a high tomato production requires both water quality and quantity. Water-scarce regions like Saudi Arabia still lack an understanding of the impact of deficit irrigation and the use of a blend of saline and freshwater, especially their nuanced impact across growth stages. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of six different irrigation amounts: full irrigation with 100% ETc (FI), regulated deficit irrigation with 60% ETc (DI), and deficit irrigation with 60% ETc, except for the initial (DI-int), development (DI-dev), mid-season (DI-mid), and late-season (DI-lat) stages. This was performed with three different water qualities: fresh (FW), saline (SW), and fresh-saline blend (1:1) (MW) water. FW and MW enhanced the growth, physiology, morphology, yield, and quality, while SW had the lowest values. DI reduced these parameters and lowered yields by 13.7%, significantly improving water use efficiency (WUE) by 44% and fruit quality. DI-mid or DI-lat slightly improved yields while remarkably decreasing WUE and fruit quality. DI outperforms deficit irrigation in all growth stages except one, and countries with limited freshwater resources can benefit from a mix of fresh and saline water with a 60% ETc deficit irrigation, resulting in greater water savings.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14030559
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.