article · Diagnostics
Urine filtration microscopy (UFM) lacks sensitivity in detecting low-intensity <i>Schistosoma haematobium</i> infections. In pursuit of a superior alternative, this study evaluated the performance of FlukeCatcher microscopy (FCM) at detecting <i>S. haematobium</i> eggs in human urine samples. Urine samples were collected from 572 school-age children in Afar, Ethiopia in July 2023 and examined using UFM and FCM approaches. Using the combined UFM and FCM results as a reference, the sensitivity, negative predictive value, and agreement levels for the two testing methods in detecting <i>S. haematobium</i> eggs in urine samples were calculated. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of detecting <i>S. haematobium</i> eggs in urine samples for FCM was 84% and 97%, respectively, compared to 65% and 93% for UFM. The FCM test results had an agreement of 61% with the UFM results, compared to 90% with the combined results of FCM and UFM. However, the average egg count estimates were lower when using FCM (6.6 eggs per 10 mL) compared to UFM (14.7 eggs per 10 mL) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Incorporating FCM into specimen processing could improve the diagnosis of <i>S. haematobium</i> infection but may underperform in characterizing the intensity of infection.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101037
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.