article · Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery
Patients with increased pressure hydrocephalus are a common referral to the Department of Neurosurgery at our institution. A descriptive cross-sectional study performed by consecutively enrolling 335 subjects who underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion between the 01 January 2014 – 30 November 2022, aimed to establish our local ventriculoperitoneal shunt sepsis incidence, and further evaluate the known risk factors for ventriculoperitoneal shunt sepsis at 3- month follow-up. In our study 335 ventriculoperitoneal shunts were inserted, 190 (57 %) were inserted in children and 145 (43 %) were inserted in adults. With regards the cause of hydrocephalus in 90/335 (26.9 %) subjects this was congenital, in 45/335 (13 %) subjects this was a primary intra-axial CNS tumor, in 40/335 (12 %) subjects this was intraventricular hemorrhage, and in 38/335 (11 %) subjects this was in subjects with a myelomeningocele. Considering the ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection incidence 28/335 (8.4 %) subjects developed this complication within 3 months of the procedure. In evaluating the significance of the known risk factors for ventriculoperitoneal shunt sepsis, our study demonstrated that having a ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion performed in the emergency theatre (p = 0.02, OR 1.87, CI 0.83–4.23), having a ventriculoperitoneal shunt inserted at night (p = 0.03, OR 3.92, CI 1.13–13.58), having a history of ventriculoperitoneal shunt sepsis (p = 0.004, OR 7.34, CI 2.20–24.55), being clinically immunosuppressed at the time of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion procedure (p = 0.03, OR 3.01, CI 1.09–8.32), and having a post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak (p = 0.04, OR 5.19, CI 0.91–29.71), demonstrated significance in predicting that ventriculoperitoneal shunt sepsis would occur. Our study confirmed that our institutional ventriculoperitoneal shunt sepsis rate is 8.4 % and furthermore confirmed the significance of several of the known risk factors as taken from the literature.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2025.102067
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.