MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Establishing FDA-approved oncology drugs as GPR176 inhibitor through homology modelling, molecular docking, MMGBSA, DFT, and molecular dynamics simulation

20261 citationOpen accessKwara State University

Abstract

The GPR176 protein is a cell membrane protein implicated in human diseases, especially cancers. Numerous studies have highlighted its overexpression, which is considered a major driver of tumorigenesis. Reducing its overexpression has been shown by many studies to be a viable pharmacological strategy for cancer therapy, prompting this study to search for drug molecules from existing FDA-approved drugs. We performed homology modeling of the GPR176 protein to obtain its 3D structure, conducted docking simulations of FDA-approved drugs retrieved from ReDO_DB to identify compounds with strong binding affinities, and carried out density functional theory quantum calculations and molecular dynamic simulations to assess stability and compactness. Additionally, pharmacokinetic profiling and drug-likeness analyses were performed to identify molecules capable of inhibiting and potentially deorphanizing GPR176. We identified Fostamatinib and Ticagrelor as both compounds exhibited binding affinities of -11.503 kcal/mol and − 11.882 kcal/mol, which indicates that both compounds effectively interact with the protein; they both had minimal deviations from their natural states as the RMSD values of 0.35 and 0.45 characterize their stability profile; energy gap of -0.1327 eV and − 0.1371 eV, which illuminates their reactivity to the protein and favorable pharmacokinetic profiles compared to the control, Vismodegib. This leads to the identification of Fostamatinib and Ticagrelor as potential inhibitors of the protein, and thus, we recommend further experimental studies to validate these findings.

Research topics

  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-31607-9

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.