MARATTO

article · Discover Water

Entropy-weighted water quality index assessment of groundwater in Ibadan metropolis, Southwestern Nigeria

202410 citationsOpen accessFederal University of Agriculture

Abstract

An entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) was used in this study to evaluate the quality of groundwater in parts of the Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. Seventy-five groundwater samples were collected and analysed for pH, electrical conductivity, total hardness, alkalinity, turbidity, total dissolved solids, cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+), anions (HCO3−, Cl−, SO42−, NO3−, F−), Fe and Total Heterotrophic Bacteria Content (THBC). The pH of the groundwater in the study area ranges from neutral to slightly alkaline. Based on the average concentrations, the abundance of anions is in the order as follows: Cl− > HCO3− > SO42− > NO3− > F−, while that of cations is Na+ > K+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+. The groundwater type was predominantly of mixed and Na-Cl types, likely controlled by multiple processes, such as water–rock interaction and mineral weathering. Anthropogenic activities, including improper waste disposal and sewage contamination, were also identified as significant contributors to groundwater quality degradation. The prevalent bacteria in this study are Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. The average EWQI value was 32.8, with values ranging from 2.2 to 143.6. Most of the groundwater in the research area, according to the EWQI, has good to excellent quality for drinking, while only 20% of the samples were medium to low quality, necessitating minimum treatment.

Research topics

  • Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Groundwater and Watershed Analysis

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s43832-024-00157-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.