MARATTO

article · Croatian Journal of Food Science and Technology

Enrichment of bread with powder from the aerial parts of purslane

2025Open accessIbn Tofail University

Abstract

As a widely consumed staple, bread serves as an excellent vehicle for incorporating plant-based ingredients with demonstrated health-promoting properties. This study evaluated the total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, mineral composition, sensory properties, and nutrient contribution of wheat bread enriched with 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% purslane powder. Mineral content was determined using ICP-AES, phenolic compounds using the Folin-Ciocalteu method, and antioxidant activity through the DPPH assay. Sensory evaluation was conducted using a five-point hedonic scale. Results showed that PO-enriched breads had significantly higher levels of phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, and mineral content compared to the control (p < 0.05), with the 15% PO formulation exhibiting the highest values. Fortification enhanced the daily intake of key minerals such as iron, magnesium, manganese, and copper. Sensory analysis revealed significant differences in consumer acceptance breads with 10% and 15% PO received lower scores than the control and 5% PO, although all samples remained acceptable (overall liking score >3). Correlation and principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated strong associations between polyphenol content, antioxidant activity, and mineral levels. The 5% PO formulation emerged as the most balanced option, offering improved nutritional value while maintaining acceptable sensory qualities. This study highlights the potential of PO as a functional ingredient to enhance the nutritional and antioxidant properties of bread, with 5% enrichment offering the best compromise between health benefits and consumer preference.

Research topics

  • Food composition and properties
  • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Seed and Plant Biochemistry

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.17508/cjfst.2025.17.2.02

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.