other · Figshare
Abstract Lightweight Electric Vehicles (EVs) require a system that is efficient, reliable, and low maintenance. Among the available options, the Brushless DC (BLDC) motor is desirable due to its compact design, high torque-to-weight ratio, and the absence of mechanical commutation. However, BLDC motors have control challenges because of nonlinear behaviors like back-EMF distortion and load sensitivity. Traditional Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers often have difficulty keeping performance under these dynamic conditions. In this study four closed-loop speed control strategies have been compared for BLDC motors: PI, Hysteresis-PI, Fuzzy Logic, and Hybrid Fuzzy-PI controllers. The aim is to optimize performance for energy-efficient lightweight EVs. Each controller is modified and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink under the same load and speed conditions applied on all four controllers. The performance of the controllers evaluated through settling time, steady-state error, overshoot, and rise time. Simulation results indicate that traditional PI controllers are simple to implement, but they do not adapt well to dynamic changes. The Hysteresis-PI controller showed the best overall performance. It provided the fastest response and improved system stability, making it a strong candidate for future EV propulsion systems.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8420644
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.