article · The Accountancy and Business Review
This study investigated the integrated border management strategies used for national security at the Namanga border in the Arusha Region of Tanzania. The aim was to identify these strategies and examine the challenges they face. The study was guided by the Panic Theory of Border Control, the Mutual Benefits Theory, and the Segmentation Theory. A mixed-method approach with a parallel convergent research design was used. Data were collected using interview guides and questionnaires. Cluster-based simple random and purposive sampling was employed to select 44 respondents, including 18 immigration officers, 5 customs officers, 12 police officers, 8 clearing and forwarding officers, and 4 heads of departments from immigration, police, customs, and clearing/forwarding offices. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed. The findings revealed that the integrated border management strategies included intra-service cooperation, inter-agency cooperation, and international cooperation. Intra-service strategies involved cooperation between central, regional, and local levels and information exchange within one ministry/agency. Inter-agency strategies included coordinated processing at border crossings and awareness-building among agencies. International strategies comprised local cooperation between officials on both sides of the border, bilateral cooperation between neighboring countries, and multinational cooperation. Major challenges identified were the lack of adequate and relevant tools and infrastructure; lack of customs harmonization, corruption, border disputes, insufficient staff, inadequate communication technology, and poor coordination within and among agencies. The study recommends that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation work towards improving coordination and cooperation among all agencies at the Namanga border.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.59645/abr.v16i2.197
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.