MARATTO

article · European Journal of STEM Education

Enhancing mathematics retention through seeing-AI: A quasi-experimental study among visually impaired junior secondary students in Ogun State, Nigeria

20261 citationOpen accessUniversity of Zululand

Abstract

The persistent challenge of poor retention in Mathematics underscores the need for effective, 21st-century instructional strategies that can sustain students’ long-term recall, particularly those students with visual impairment. The study examines the impact of gender and the Seeing AI method on the retention of mathematics among students with visual impairments in junior secondary schools in Ogun State, Nigeria. A quantitative approach to quasi-experimental design was employed. Purposive sampling was used to select two schools, 10 students each assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The Mathematics Retention Test (MRT), with a reliability coefficient of 0.82, was administered over three weeks alongside pre-test and post-test measures. Data were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). Findings revealed that Seeing AI had a statistically significant positive effect on students’ Mathematics retention (p < 0.05). Gender did not exert a statistically significant main effect; however, there was a significant interaction effect between strategy and gender, indicating disparities in retention patterns across male and female students. The study concludes that Seeing-AI effectively enhances Mathematics retention among students with visual impairment, irrespective of gender differences. It recommends integrating this strategy into special education practices to ensure fairness and long-term effectiveness in learning.

Research topics

  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • E-Learning and COVID-19

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.20897/ejsteme/18268

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.