MARATTO

review · BMJ Global Health

Enhanced or hindered research benefits? A realist review of community engagement and participatory research practices for non-communicable disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries

202414 citationsOpen accessAga Khan University Kenya

Abstract

Our review challenges assumptions about community engagement and participatory research being solely beneficial in the context of non-communicable disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries. We present both helpful and harmful pathways through which health and research outcomes are affected. Our practical recommendations relate to maximising benefits and minimising harm by addressing institutional inflexibility and researcher capabilities, managing expectations on research, promoting solidarity in solving public health challenges and sharing decision-making power.

Research topics

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013712

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.