MARATTO

article · Energies

Energy Consumption and Trade Openness Nexus in Egypt: Asymmetry Analysis

201930 citationsOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

In plain language

An analysis of data from 1971 to 2014 examines how economic growth and trade openness influence energy consumption in Egypt. The study evaluates asymmetric relationships, looking at whether positive and negative shifts in growth and trade have unequal impacts. Findings reveal that economic growth and trade openness both exhibit asymmetric effects on energy consumption across the short and long run. Both increases and decreases in economic expansion generally raise energy consumption across both timeframes, though a decrease in growth has an insignificant short-run impact. Similarly, rising and falling trade openness both lead to higher energy consumption, with the exception of decreasing trade openness in the long run, which is insignificant. Because growth and open trade drive higher energy use, they risk generating negative environmental consequences. In response, policy advice urges the Egyptian government to diversify its energy use away from fossil fuels.

Key takeaways

  • Economic growth and trade openness display unequal, asymmetric effects on Egypt's energy use in both the short and long term.
  • Increases and decreases in economic growth both lead to higher energy consumption, except for a negligible short-run effect when growth falls.
  • Trade openness increases energy demand in almost all scenarios, although reductions in trade have an insignificant long-run impact.
  • Diversifying Egypt's energy supply away from fossil fuel sources is recommended to mitigate the environmental impact of trade and economic expansion.

Why it matters

Expanding international trade and economic activities often fuel heavier energy demands, leading to heightened environmental risks. Understanding that growth and trade changes do not affect energy use symmetrically helps governments plan realistic infrastructure demands. For Egypt, it highlights the pressing necessity to move away from fossil fuel dependency towards cleaner energy sources to sustain long-term economic development without worsening environmental degradation.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate a commercial application pathway, as it represents macroeconomic policy analysis rather than a product or technology. However, the recommendation to diversify from fossil fuels suggests relevant strategic insights for clean energy project developers, utility planners, and policymakers. This research provides early-stage macroeconomic evidence to guide government energy policy and clean energy planning rather than a deployable commercial asset.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Trade openness may support the economic growth of any country but its environmental effects due to increasing energy consumption cannot be ignored. This research hypothesizes the asymmetrical effects of both economic growth and trade openness on the energy consumption of Egypt from 1971–2014. Our estimates suggest that both economic growth and trade openness have asymmetrical effects on the energy consumption in both long and short runs because magnitude of the effects are found unequal. Both increasing and decreasing economic growth have positive effects on the energy consumption in the long and short runs except an insignificant effect of decreasing economic growth in the short run. Increasing and decreasing trade openness have also positive effects on the energy consumption in the long and short runs except an insignificant effect of decreasing trade openness in the long run. The increasing energy consumption, as results of increasing economic growth and/or trade openness, may have environmental consequence. Therefore, we recommend the Egyptian government to diversify the energy consumption from fossil fuel sources.

Research topics

  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Energy and Environment Impacts

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/en12102018

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.