review · medtigo Journal of Medicine
Background: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are synthetic and natural compounds that interfere with hormonal regulation and are linked to obesity, diabetes, thyroid disorders, reproductive dysfunction, and hormone-sensitive cancers. Despite European regulatory measures, human exposure persists through food, consumer products, and the environment, raising significant public health concerns. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of EDC exposure in European populations and evaluate associations with major endocrine-related health outcomes. Methodology: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus identified observational studies published between January 2000 and July 2025. Eligible studies reported biomonitoring data on key EDCs (bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), dioxins, and organochlorine pesticides) and/or statistically assessed associations with endocrine outcomes. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis generated pooled prevalence estimates and effect sizes, with subgroup analyses by region, sex, age, and chemical class. Heterogeneity was quantified using I², and publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: Preliminary findings indicate widespread detection of PFAS and phthalates, particularly in Western and Northern Europe, with growing evidence of links to metabolic and reproductive outcomes. Conclusion: EDC exposure remains a significant and under-recognised public health issue in Europe. This review highlights the need for strengthened regulatory frameworks, ongoing surveillance, and further research to mitigate the long-term health risks associated with EDCs.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.63096/medtigo30612310
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.