article · Scientific Reports
Despite the proven antioxidant potential of Pomegranate Peel Extract (PPE), the lack of scalable, cost-effective, and systematically optimized processes for encapsulating PPE hinders its industrial application. This study presents an integrated laboratory proof-of-concept experiment, computer-aided batch process scale-up simulation, techno-economic assessment (TEA), and life cycle analysis (LCA) of PP bioactive phenolic extract microencapsulation via freeze-drying using a binary Gum Arabic and Maltodextrin wall system. Aspen Batch Process Developer (ABPD) was employed to simulate and scale the process across three production scenarios: mini-pilot (5 kg/day, Case 1), pilot-scale (100 kg/day, Case 2) and industrial-scale (5,000 kg/day, Case 3. The results were validated against experimental data with negligible deviation (MSE = 0.0001; MAPE = 0.06%). Physicochemical characterization confirmed high solubility (96.12%), low water activity (0.28), partial hygroscopicity (12.57%), and strong antioxidant capacity, collectively confirming functional stability for food and nutraceutical applications. TEA revealed progressive economic improvement with scale: Case 3 achieved the highest NPV ($18 million), the lowest levelized cost of production ($7.08/kg), and a strong IRR (53.9%). In contrast, Cases 1 and 2, which represented lower-scale setups, yielded lower NPVs and higher production costs. Monte Carlo simulation ( N = 10,000) identified selling price and annual production cost as the dominant profitability drivers, with Case 2 emerging as the most risk-adjusted investment pathway, achieving P(NPV > 0) of 91.9%. The LCA revealed that electrical energy consumption dominated environmental impacts. Freeze-drying alone accounted for 74.7–77.3% of total burdens and drove a GWP of 84.17 kg CO₂-eq per kg PPEP, highlighting energy management as the primary sustainability hotspot.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-63833-0
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.