MARATTO

article · Science & Education

Embodiment Matters in Knowledge Building

20249 citationsOpen accessRhodes University

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we begin a conversation with educators invested in developing epistemic insight. We argue that generative artificial intelligence provides an opportunity to make a necessary corrective to our understanding of knowledge and knowledge building. The use of the metaphors of such as ‘human-as-machine’ has inadvertently promoted a reductive understanding of knowledge which has led to an impoverished version of higher education. In reducing the person to an information processor, knowledge has been artificially separated from the knower. The view of the human person as a relational being situated in time and space along with a recognition that intuition and imagination are important dimensions of knowledge development point to the significance of the embodiment of knowledge. For knowledge to have value and meaning, it must be enacted by a particular, embodied person. The recognition of the importance of embodiment and the associated implications are crucial if higher education is to respond in a meaningful way to the challenge presented by generative AI.

Research topics

  • Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s11191-024-00506-2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.