MARATTO

peer review

eLife Assessment: Sleep-Wake Transitions Are Impaired in the AppNL-G-F Mouse Model of Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Poor sleep quality and reduced sleep duration are associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-related β-amyloid (Aβ) pathologies. We conducted two studies of sleep/wake, activity and body temperature in AppNL-G-F mice, a strain that exhibits three mutations in the human App gene associated with elevated risk for early onset AD. First, AppNL-G-F mice were compared to wildtype (WT) littermates at 14-18 and 18-22 months of age and, at both ages, were found to exhibit partial insomnia with more Wake and less NREM and REM sleep than WT littermates. This long wake/short sleep phenotype was evident during the dark phase at 14-18 months but occurred in both the light and dark phases at 18-22 months. AppNL-G-F mice had fewer short (<60 sec) and more long (>260 sec) Wake bouts and were hyperactive at 18-22 months, which undoubtedly contributed to the increased Wake/reduced sleep. Despite this partial insomnia phenotype, AppNL-G-F mice were no sleepier than WT mice and the sleep homeostat was functional in both strains. In the second study, sex differences in these parameters were assessed at 18-24 months. Partial insomnia was evident in both sexes of AppNL-G-F mice but was clearly stronger in females. Wake and REM sleep bout durations were longer in both sexes of AppNL-G-F mice than in WT littermates. EEG spectral power during NREM sleep was reduced in female AppNL-G-F mice between 4.88-10.50 Hz compared to WT mice whereas, during REM sleep, both male and female AppNL-G-F mice exhibited reduced spectral power in the theta range. These results suggest that Aβ deposition may impair state transition mechanism(s) in AppNL-G-F mice and demonstrate that, as in human AD patients, female AppNL-G-F mice exhibit a stronger insomniac-like phenotype, thus supporting the use of this strain as a model to investigate interventions that mitigate AD burden during early disease stages.

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.7554/elife.110240.1.sa4

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.