article · RSC Advances
Calcium silicate-based bioceramics have attracted attention in biomedical applications due to their calcium and silicon contents, which are essential for bone health. Whitlockite (WH), the second most abundant inorganic component of bones after hydroxyapatite (HAP), constitutes 20-35% of bones by weight and exhibits excellent biological properties, making it particularly attractive for tissue engineering. It is therefore essential to synthesize the WH phase using cost-effective and eco-friendly by-products. This study aims to synthesize the whitlockite phase using dicalcium silicate (larnite, Ca<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>4</sub>). Dicalcium silicate was synthesized from a mixture of limestone dust (LD), a by-product consisting essentially of calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>), and soda lime glass powders, as a source of silicon dioxide (SiO<sub>2</sub>). Additionally, the surface reactivity and bioactivity of the composite sample were evaluated <i>in vitro</i> by immersing it in artificial saliva (SA) and in a simulated body fluid (SBF) for time periods ranging from 1 hour to 5 hours. The mineralogical and microstructural properties of the samples were characterized using XRD, FTIR and SEM analysis techniques. The characterization of the obtained powders indicated that the whitlockite phase synthesized through a co-precipitation method exhibited good bioactivity both in artificial saliva (SA) and simulated body fluid (SBF). Moreover, the analysis revealed the development of a hydration phase of rosenhahnite (Ca<sub>3</sub>Si<sub>3</sub>O<sub>10</sub>H<sub>2</sub>) and the formation of a hydroxyapatite (Ca<sub>5</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(OH)) phase within 1 hour of immersion in both bioactive media. The morphology of the samples was analyzed using SEM, which showed significant grain growth and consolidation after 1 hour of immersion in artificial saliva and simulated body fluid. After 5 hours, the grains appeared to be well connected with each other, indicating good consolidation.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1039/d5ra05840f
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.