MARATTO

article · African Scientific Reports

Efficient and optimal adsorptive removal of urea from agricultural effluent using acidified ball clay: optimization via response surface methodology

20262 citationsOpen accessNational Open University of Nigeria

Abstract

Agricultural runoff rich in urea content poses a threat to the aquatic ecosystems. This study investigated the adsorptive potential of acidified ball clay in removing urea from agricultural effluents as well as the conditions of temperature, adsorbent dosage, time, and pH that will give the optimum removal by adopting response surface methodology (RSM). Characterizations of the acidified ball to understand its adsorptive properties revealed the abundance of visible pores on the acidified ball clay for possible accommodation of adsorbate (urea) by SEM, while after adsorption the initial visible pores are slightly batched, indicating interaction between the adsorbate and adsorbent. The TEM analysis showed a number of spherical-shaped and well-dispersed nanostructures of adsorbent whose number doubles on addition of adsorbate after adsorption. The FTIR spectrum of modified ball clay showed the presence of O-H, Si-O-Si, and Al-OH groups. The EDX spectrum for the acidified ball clay unveils the elemental composition by weight in the order: Si (59.0%) > Al (18.4%) > O (12.3%) > N (3.0%) = C (3.0%) > Fe (2.8%) > Ca (1.3%). The batch process showed that acidified ball clay exhibited good potential for urea adsorption. Achieving a maximum removal efficiency of 89.14% with a corresponding capacity of 1815.3 mg/g from an initial concentration of 152.7 mg/L at optimum conditions of pH =3, temperature = 35°C, dosage 3.75 g, contact time = 30 minutes, and rate of 4.53 min-1.

Research topics

  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Fluoride Effects and Removal

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.46481/asr.2026.5.1.367

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.