article · Ain Shams Dental Journal
Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare laser activated irrigation using Photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) to passive ultrasonic activation (PUI) and in terms of the ability to disinfect the root canal. Methods: 45 single rooted upper anteriors were inoculated with E. faecalis and candida albicans to form a biofilm, then randomly divided into four groups that differ in the activation method (PIPS group, PUI group, and a control group that employs syringe irrigation without activation). Confocal scanning electron microscope (CLSM) was then used to evaluate and compare groups in terms of bacterial reduction. Results: There was a significant difference between different groups (p<0.001). The mean value and standard deviation (SD) of PIPS was (57.34±3.70), followed, while the lowest value was found in PUI group (41.40±6.38). Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed PIPS group to have a significantly higher value than other groups (p<0.001). Conclusions: Activation of Sodium hypochlorite irrigant using Er:YAG laser utilizing PIPS technique increased its biofilm eradication capability, showing the best biofilm eradication in the apical third. However, none of the root canal disinfection methods resulted in complete eradication.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/asdj.2023.212496.1177
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.