article · Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Background: Risankizumab, a selective IL-23 inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic agent for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This study aims to systematically assess its efficacy and safety through an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted from their inception to 15 April 2025 for RCTs comparing risankizumab with placebo or active comparators in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Data were pooled using random-effects models (RevMan 5.4), and heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 (RoB 2) was utilized for risk of bias assessment of each included RCT. The forest plots were generated using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eleven RCTs ( n = 2664 patients) were included in the study. Risankizumab showed significantly greater efficacy than placebo for PASI 75 (OR: 23.93, 95% CI: 7.80–73.41), PASI 90 (OR: 18.11, 95% CI: 5.03–65.24), and PASI 100 (OR: 30.31, 95% CI: 12.36–74.34). Compared to active comparators (ustekinumab and adalimumab), risankizumab demonstrated a superior PASI 90 response (OR 3.40, 95% CI: 2.32–4.96). Quality of life (DLQI) improved significantly (OR: 31.53, 95% CI: 19.46–51.09). No increased risk of SAEs was observed (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.33–1.54), although the infection risk was slightly elevated (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.87–2.18). Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms the superiority of risankizumab over placebo and other biologics in achieving complete or near-complete skin clearance, with a favorable safety profile. These findings suggest that risankizumab is a first-line biologic agent for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, although infection monitoring remains warranted.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000005155
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.