review · Journal of Arrhythmia

Efficacy and safety of pulsed‐field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Ahmed Mazen Amin
Mohamed A. Ellabban
Mohamed Abuelazm
Basel Abdelazeem
Mustafa Turkmani
Aya Moustafa Aboutaleb
Moumen Arnaout
Ahmed A. Ibrahim
Abubakar Nazir
Hossam Elbenawi
Annabelle Santos Volgman

202427 citationsOpen accessZagazig University

Abstract

PFA was significantly associated with decreased AF recurrence, total procedure time, heart rate change, phrenic nerve palsy, esophageal lesion, and increased incidence of pericardial tamponade compared with thermal ablation.

Research topics

Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Sustainable Development Goals

3Good Health and Well-being

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

View on publisher site Record on OpenAlex

DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13118

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.

New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.