MARATTO

preprint

Effects of herbage distribution, botanical composition, and rumen inoculum source on in vitro gas fermentation kinetics

2024Open accessMakerere University

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> The random sourcing of rumen liquor from abattoir-slaughtered cattle may influence <italic>in vitro</italic> gas production results due to variations in diet composition. This study evaluated the effects of herbage distribution, botanical composition, and rumen liquor source on rumen fermentation kinetics using the <italic>in vitro</italic> gas production technique. Three districts in Uganda's cattle corridor with different grazing systems and vegetation types were purposively selected: Mbarara (improved mixed pastures), Nakasongola (woody shrublands), and Napak (grasslands). Karamoja had the highest herbage diversity (n = 40), followed by Mbarara (n = 32) and Nakasongola (n = 19), with grasses comprising over 75% of samples from Nakasongola and Mbarara, and 53% from Karamoja. Karamoja herbage had significantly higher crude protein (132.6 g/Kg DM). Gas production varied significantly (P &lt; 0.001) across herbage sources during incubation. Fermentation kinetics were influenced by both the rumen liquor and herbage source (P &lt; 0.001), while gas production rate from the insoluble fraction (b) was only affected by herbage source (P &lt; 0.001). <italic>In vitro</italic> organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) estimated metabolizable energy (ME), and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were also significantly influenced by herbage source (P &lt; 0.001). Herbage composition had a greater impact on fermentation kinetics and IVOMD than the source of rumen liquor. These results suggest that rumen liquor from cattle raised under similar grazing systems yields consistent in vitro gas production results.

Research topics

  • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5162625/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.