MARATTO

article · Case Studies in Construction Materials

Effectiveness of mechanically anchored CRM and SRG jackets for enhancing torsional behavior of RC beams

2026Open accessZagazig University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Torsional failure presents a significant challenge in structural engineering, often causing rapid degradation and brittle failure in RC beams. This study experimentally investigates the effectiveness of Composite Reinforced Mortar (CRM) and Steel Reinforced Grout (SRG) jacketing for enhancing the torsional performance of RC beams, examining key design variables including mesh type (high-tensile steel versus GFRP), number of layers (single versus double), and the use of mechanical anchorage. Results show that all CRM and SRG jackets substantially improve torsional response by increasing stiffness and delaying crack initiation compared to unstrengthened beams. CRM consistently outperformed GFRP-mesh systems due to higher tensile capacity and more stable post-cracking behavior. Mechanical anchorage proved critical for fully mobilizing the composite, shifting failure from premature debonding to mesh rupture or localized concrete damage. The optimal configuration (steel mesh, double layers, and end anchors) achieved more than a 200% increase in ultimate torque and over 300% rise in absorbed energy relative to the original beam, demonstrating remarkable gains in ductility and toughness. Increasing CRM layers from one to two further enhanced cracking and ultimate torque, with anchored specimens showing distributed fine cracking rather than the single diagonal crack observed in the reference beam. These findings confirm that properly designed and anchored SRG and CRM jacketing provides a highly effective, robust solution for the torsional strengthening and rehabilitation of RC structures.

Research topics

  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06319

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.