article · Egyptian Journal of Health Care
Background: Urinary incontinence is an important multifactorial health problem that affects women's life quality. Aim: To evaluate the Effectiveness of Intervention Guideline on Self Care of Women Suffering from Stress Urinary Incontinence Methods: A quasi-experimental study design was used. Setting: The study was conducted in the urodynamic unit at the Maternity Hospital Ain Shams University. Study Sample: It was a simple random sample of 100 stressed incontinent women admitted in urodynamic Unit at the Maternity Hospital. Data collected for a period of nine months from march to November 2021. Four tools were utilized for collected data Tool I: A structured interviewing questionnaire sheet to assess general characteristics of study sample, stress incontinence and their obstetrical data. Tool II: self-care practice check list to assess bladder retraining technique, hygienic measures, pelvic floor muscle exercise of study sample. Tool III: voiding diary to assess fluid intake, amount of urine excretes, amount of stress incontinence, frequency of leak urine of study sample. Tool IV: follow up chart to assess frequency of using the intervention guideline among study sample. Results: there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding all general characteristics, regarding obstetrical and gynecological history of study sample 40.0%of the study group developed incontinence while 30.0% of control group had excessive bleeding there was highly statistically significant between the study group and control group of all items of voiding diary of post guideline at P <0.001. Conclusion: The study revealed improvement in the severity of stress urinary incontinence and self-care practice among the study group compared to the control group. Recommendations: Performing training guidelines for improving women's awareness about urinary incontinence and self-care. Replication of the study on a larger probability sample for generalizing the findings and studying the factors affecting women's utilization of urodynamic services.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/ejhc.2024.386716
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.