MARATTO

article · Menoufia Journal of Animal Poultry and Fish Production

Effect of Yeast Extract on In-vitro Degradation of Low Quality Roughages

2024Open accessMenoufia University

Abstract

This study was conducted at Al-Rahep farm and the nutrition laboratory at the Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Menoufia University (Shebin El-Kom), to investigate the effect of yeast extract on the degradation of low-quality roughage, digestibility, rumen fermentation, blood criteria, and immunity status of Barki sheep. Commercial dry yeast products (EGYBELG®, LA ROYALE Instant dry yeast, manufactured by Egyptian Belgian Co. Egypt) prepared for yeast extract (YE). Viable yeast cell concentration was 2.44 × 1011 CFU/g yeast product. The yeast extract was prepared and checked for enzyme activity. Tested grounded roughages, including rice straw (RS), corn cops (CC), corn stover (CS), and wheat straw (WS) supplemented with three levels of YE; the 1st: without yeast extract (YE0), 2 g yeast extract /kg DM (YEL1) and 4 g yeast extract /kg DM (YEL2) were used in an in-vitro digestibility trial. The in-vitro study revealed that RS supplemented with yeast extract at 4g/kg DM (YEL2) recorded the highest in-vitro dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein digestibility (IVDMD, IVOMD, and IVCPD) values. To clarify the results of the in-vitro study, a digestibility trial was designed on 15 Barki rams (five rams/group). Three rations were prepared with the same roughage: concentrate ratio of 30:70%; Ration 1 (RSR):70% concentrate feed mixture (CFM) + 30% rice straw (control negative). Ration 2 (YER): control negative ration supplemented with 4 g YE/kg DM. Ration 3 (CHR): 70%CFM + 30% clover hay (control positive).

Research topics

  • Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
  • Engineering Technology and Methodologies
  • Polymer Science and Applications

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/mjapfp.2024.401249

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.