MARATTO

article · Egyptian Dental Journal /Egyptian Dental Journal

Effect of Using Fiber Reinforcement Ribbond® System on Marginal Adaptation of Fluoride Releasing Restorations: An In Vitro Study

2024Open accessOctober 6 University

Abstract

Aim: To assess the impact of using Ribbond® fibers on the marginal adaptation of three Giomer restorative materials at the gingival margin in class II restorations.Materials and Methods: Three Giomer restorative materials were evaluated; BEAUTIFIL II (SHOFU INC., Kyoto, Japan), BEAUTIFIL II LS (SHOFU INC., Kyoto, Japan), BEAUTIFIL-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU INC., Kyoto, Japan). Sixty human mandibular molars were collected. Standardized occluso-mesial box-only cavities were prepared. The cavities were allocated into 6 groups (n = 10) according to the type of restorative material; Group 1: Nanohybrid Giomer: BEAUTIFIL II (BE), Group 2: Low-shrinking nanohybrid Giomer: BEAUTIFIL II LS (BLS), Group 3: Bulk-fill Giomer: BEAUTIFL-Bulk Restorative (BBR), Group 4: Nanohybrid Giomer: BEAUTIFIL II + Fiber Reinforcement Ribbond® System (BE+R), Group 5: Low-shrinking nanohybrid Giomer: BEAUTIFIL II LS + Fiber Reinforcement Ribbond® System (BLS+R), Group 6: Bulk-fill Giomer: BEAUTIFL-Bulk Restorative + Fiber Reinforcement Ribbond® System (BBR+R). All restorations were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles between 5°C-55°C. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to analyze the gingival margins of the restorations at 50× magnification to determine the length of the gap (non-continuous) margin. Shapiro-Wilk test, two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test were used to analyze the results statistically. Results: The mean percentage of non-continuous margins for the groups was as follows: BE (29.47±1.88), BLS (28.59±1.74), BBR (12.30±1.43). BE+R (15.44±1.31), BLS+R (10.70±0.92), BBR+R (15.20±0.99).Conclusions: The use of Ribbond® fibers improves the marginal adaptation at the gingival margins of class II of incrementally-packed Giomer restorative materials.

Research topics

  • Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Dental materials and restorations

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/edj.2023.229953.2684

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.