MARATTO

article · International Journal of Polymer Science

Effect of Raphia vinifera Fibre Size and Reinforcement Ratio on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of an Epoxy Matrix Composite: Micromechanical Modelling and Weibull Analysis

202317 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of lengths and reinforcement ratio of Raphia vinifera fibres (RVFs) on the physical and mechanical properties of an epoxy matrix composite. Three volume fractions (20%, 30%, and 40%) and three lengths (5, 10, and 15 mm) of fibres were used to produce the composite, and the samples were subjected to the absolute and apparent density, porosity, water absorption rate, and tensile and flexural strength. The probability of failure of the composite is described by the means of two-factor Weibull model. In addition, a theoretical approach to predict mechanical characteristics based on empirical models was carried out. The results show that the addition of RVF decreases the density of the composite, while the porosity and absorption rate increase. The mechanical test shows that the tensile and flexural stress and Young’s modulus of the composite are lowered compared to those of the resin alone. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and Tukey test showed that fibre lengths and reinforcement ratio significantly lower the mechanical properties of the composite. The distribution of strength and Young’s modulus follows Weibull’s law. Furthermore, the Cox–Krenkel mathematical model has the best approximated model for the experimental results after the tensile test. Based on these results, this material could be used as reinforcement parts for vehicle backrests or interior decoration in the construction industry.

Research topics

  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Textile materials and evaluations

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1155/2023/5591108

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.