MARATTO

article · Animals

Effect of Nitrogen Sources on Diatoms Growth and Nutritional Value for Enhancing Litopenaeus vannamei Larval Performance

20254 citationsOpen accessFuture University in Egypt

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of different nitrogen sources on the growth and biochemical composition of two diatom species, Chaetoceros calcitrans and Thalassiosira weissflogii, and evaluated their use as live feed for Litopenaeus vannamei larvae. Diatoms were cultured in a Conway medium supplemented with four nitrogen sources: potassium nitrate (control), urea, ammonium sulfate, and ammonium nitrate. In a separate experiment, white-leg shrimp larvae (300 larvae/L) at stage Nauplius 6 were fed diets consisting of C. calcitrans, T. weissflogii, or a combination of both diatoms under controlled conditions. The results indicated that urea, ammonium nitrate, and ammonium sulfate significantly enhanced the growth and nutrient composition of C. calcitrans and T. weissflogii compared to the control (potassium nitrate). In C. calcitrans, ammonium nitrate significantly increased protein and lipid contents, while carbohydrate levels were the highest in the control. Similarly, urea and ammonium sulfate treatments yielded the highest lipid levels, whereas the control exhibited the lowest. For T. weissflogii, the control achieved the highest cell count on day 4, but ammonium nitrate significantly improved protein and lipid contents while reducing carbohydrate levels. A mixed diet of C. calcitrans and T. weissflogii significantly enhanced growth performance and reduced mortality rates in L. vannamei larvae compared to single-species diets. In conclusion, the findings indicated that ammonium nitrate was an efficient nitrogen source for enhancing diatom growth. Additionally, combining C. calcitrans and T. weissflogii as a diet improved growth and survival of L. vannamei larvae, offering practical implications for aquaculture.

Research topics

  • Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Aquatic life and conservation
  • Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/ani15040466

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.