article · Minia Journal of Medical Research
Background:The gold standard for minimizing complications in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (SETMI)is primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).On the other hand,myocardial damage might result from reperfusion injury.Nicorandil may help avoid reperfusion damage due to its anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective properties.Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) have been associated with the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio(CAR),a biomarker that indicates inflammatory state. Aim:To evaluate the effect of nicorandil tablets on CAR as a short-term prognostic biomarker in patients presenting with STEMI undergoing PPCI and to study the effect of oral nicorandil on their clinical and angiographic results. Patients and methods:500 patients eligible to PPCI were enrolled in our study.Patients were divided into two groups: group 1(n= 250)who administered nicorandil tablets and group 2(n= 250)who received standard care therapy without oral nicorandil. ECG, Echocardiography, laboratory investigations including CRP and albumin were performed. In-hospital MACE, angiographic and PPCI data were recorded. A follow up period after 1-month to 5-point MACE and CAR were the end point of our study. Results:Group 1 had lower CAR level than group 2 after admission (5.8±0.6) vs.(12.9±1.9),P= <0.001,at discharge (5.2±0.8)vs.(13.3±1.7),P= <0.001 and after 1 month of follow up (2.14±0.36) vs. (4.5±0.48),P= <0.001.Group 1 had higher number of patients with TIMI flow 3 and myocardial blush grade 3;197(78.8%)vs.147(58.8%) and 163(65.2%) vs.119(47.6%),P= 0.003 and 0.001respectively. Group 1 had statistically significant fewer number of patients who encountered in-hospital and follow up MACE. Conclusion:Oral nicorandil administration was associated with significant reduction in CAR,better clinical and angiographic outcomes emphasizing its potential as a prognostic biomarker in PPCI patients.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2024.345991.1853
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.