article · Frontiers in Oral Health
Objectives: Limited data are available regarding salivary inflammatory marker levels following conventional versus minimally invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy and smoking cessation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy (CNST) versus minimally invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy (MINST) on the levels of salivary inflammatory markers, specifically interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), in patients with stage III grade A/B periodontitis. Moreover, it investigated the impact of smoking cessation on these biomarkers and compared outcomes among smokers, non-smokers (NS), and individuals who quit smoking. Methods: A randomized controlled biochemical trial was conducted with 40 patients divided into four groups: smokers who quit and received conventional therapy (SQ1), smokers who quit and received minimally invasive therapy (SQ2), smokers continuing to smoke (SC), and NS. Results: Both the SQ2 and NS groups reported significant reductions in salivary PGE2 and IL-1β levels at both observation periods compared with the SC group. Conclusions: MINST appeared more effective in controlling inflammatory markers among patients who quit smoking compared with conventional non-surgical therapy.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3389/froh.2026.1779330
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.