article · Egyptian Dental Journal /Egyptian Dental Journal
Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare between 25% metronidazole gel and 25% metronidazole loaded nanoparticle gel formulation on healing of experimentally induced periodontal defects in dogs.Materials and Methods: Periodontal defects were induced by ligatures placement in 10 beagle dogs in both lower sites. The defects were randomly and equally allocated in a split-mouth design to either Metronidazole gel nanoparticles gel (25%) (Experimental site group I) or Metronidazole gel (25 %) (Control site group II) The animals were sacrificed with an overdose of anesthesia at 8 weeks and block sections of the defects were collected for histological and histometric analysis.Results: The results showed improved outcomes in terms of bone as well as new cementum and functionally oriented periodontal ligament formation. However, sites treated with metronidazole loaded nanoparticles (25%) gel formula (experimental group I) showed significantly greater regenerative potential of the attachment apparatus in terms of newly formed cementum and bone compared to conventional metronidazole gel treated group.Conclusion: This, in turn, proves that 25% metronidazole loaded nanoparticle gel is more efficient compared to conventional metronidazole gel in treatment of periodontal defects. Clinical Relevance: Scientific Rationale for Study: Evaluating the effect of metronidazole loaded nanoparticles on the treatment of induced periodontal defects in dogs. Principal Findings: Findings from this animal study of 10 beagle dogs supported the potential of metronidazole loaded nanoparticles gel, as compared to 25% metronidazole gel, for providing a safe, inexpensive, and effective therapy for induced periodontitis by regenerating new bone as well as new cementum and forming functionally oriented periodontal ligaments. Practical Implications: Metronidazole loaded nanoparticles gel can be used as adjunctive treatment of periodontitis.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2015.71407
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.