MARATTO

article · Materials science forum

Effect of Lamellae Modification in Eutectic Al<sub>82.70</sub>Cu<sub>17.30</sub> Alloy on its Electrochemical Performance as Anode Using Symmetric Cell Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

Abstract

The purpose of this research is investigating the effect of eutectic lamellae modification through heat-treatments on the electrochemical performance of Eutectic aluminum-copper (E-Al 82.70 Cu 17.30 at%) alloy. The alloy works as anode in less expensive aluminum chloride (AlCl 3 ) aqueous electrolyte using Symmetric Cell Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (SCEIS). The alloy was produced using an arc furnace followed by heat-treatments at different conditions. X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscope (OM), were used to characterize the alloys followed by SCEIS testing. The as-cast E-Al 82.70 Cu 17.30 showed some inhomogeneities in the lamellae microstructure, while heat-treating the as-cast E-Al 82.70 Cu 17.30 produced homogenized sponge-like eutectic microstructure. Two heat-treatment conditions were employed, that is 1. Heating the as cast alloy at 535 °C and soaking for one hour, and 2. Heating at 535 °C and soaking for five hours. Electrochemical Impedance spectroscopy measurements were performed on these three (3) samples. The Nyquist plot of as-cast E-Al 82.70 Cu 17.30 , 1 and 5 hours annealling heat-treated (1HT and 5HT respectively) displayed characteristic diameters in high, medium, and also low frequency range. After fitting using complex non-linear least squares method, 1HT condition has bulk resistance (R I ) and charge transfer resistance (R CT ) of ~9 Ω and ~566 Ω respectively, as compared to As-cast condition, which has R I of ~ 14 Ω and R CT of ~ 695 Ω, whiles 5HT condition has R I of ~26 Ω and R CT of ~724 Ω.

Research topics

  • Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
  • Semiconductor materials and interfaces

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4028/p-m1utbn

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.