MARATTO

article · Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions

Effect of Kinetic Control Retraining on Electromyographic Activity of Trunk Muscles in Patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2026Open accessCairo University

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether adding kinetic control retraining to conventional physical therapy improves trunk muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity, pain, and disability in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy in a randomized controlled trial.Methods: Fifty patients (35-50 years) were randomly assigned to a study group (kinetic control plus conventional therapy) and an active control group (conventional therapy) for six weeks.EMG activity of transversus abdominis (TA), erector spinae (ES) and superficial multifidus (MF) was assessed during trunk flexion/extension as root mean square (RMS) normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC).Pain and disability were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).Outcomes were assessed by a blinded assessor who was unaware of group allocation at baseline and post-intervention.Results: Both groups showed improvements (p < 0.05).However, the study group showed greater reductions in ES and MF activity, VAS, and ODI, and increased TA activation compared with controls, suggesting clinical improvement.No adverse events.Conclusion: In patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy, adding kinetic control retraining to conventional physical therapy was associated with greater short-term improvements in trunk muscle activation patterns, pain, and disability than conventional physical therapy alone.However, these findings do not isolate the independent effect of kinetic control retraining.ClinicalTrials.govID: NCT07079202.

Research topics

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.22540/jmni-26-436

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.