article
Within the window remove-restore technique (Abd-Elmotaal and Kühtreiber, 2003), the effect of the topographic-isostatic masses is removed from the source free-air gravity anomalies using high-resolution Digital Terrain Models (DTMs) and a terrain correction software, e.g., TC-program (Forsberg, 1984). A harmonic analysis of the topographic-isostatic masses is then applied to compute the effect of the topographic-isostatic masses over the data window to adapt the used geopotential model, in order to avoid a double consideration of their contribution. In this study, it is intended to use only the topographic masses in the window remove-restore technique and to compare the results with the case of using the topographic-isostatic masses. This comparison allows estimating the effect of the isostatic masses in the framework of the window remove-restore technique. The quantification of the effect is done for two mountainous regions, the Alps in Austria and the Rocky Mountains region in Colorado. The comparison is performed at two levels: reduced anomalies and computed geoidal heights. The results demonstrate the impact of the isostatic masses in window remove-restore technique and are discussed in detail.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3074
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.