MARATTO

article

Effect of diaphragmatic doming versus breathing exercises on ventilatory function and core endurance in chronic neck pain patients

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of this study was to compare diaphragmatic doming with breathing exercises on ventilatory parameters and deep cervical flexor (DCF) endurance in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP). Materials and Methods. Sixty participants with CNP were randomly assigned to two groups: group A received breathing exercises combined with traditional physiotherapy, and group B received diaphragmatic doming combined with traditional physiotherapy. Pre- and post-treatment assessments included ventilatory function and DCF endurance. Results. Both groups showed significant improvements in ventilatory function, with no significant difference between them. However, DCF endurance improved significantly more in group B (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Diaphragmatic doming was more effective than breathing exercises in improving DCF endurance, while both interventions were equally effective in improving ventilatory function.

Research topics

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.56984/8zg020a24f

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.