MARATTO

article · Egyptian Journal of Health Care

Effect of Counter-Pressure Versus Effleurage Massages on Labor Pain Intensity Among Parturient Women

20212 citationsOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

Abstract

Context: Labor-related pain is a universal experience for parturient women. Several non- pharmacological methods have been utilized to relieve this pain including counter-pressure and effleurage massages. Aim: This study aimed to examine the effect of counter-pressure versus effleurage massages on labor pain intensity among parturient women. Methods: A quasi- experimental design (nonequivalent control group pretest/posttest) was adopted. A purposive sample of 96 parturient women was recruited and allocated to either control, counter-pressure, or effleurage massage group. This study was conducted at inpatient obstetrics and gynecology department of Kafrelsheikh general hospital, Kafrelsheikh governorate, Egypt. Data were collected using two tools: structured interviewing questionnaire schedule and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Results: The mean pain scores at baseline assessment did not show a significant difference between the control group and interventions groups (p>0.05). However, at 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after intervention the differences in mean pain scores between the control group and interventions groups were highly statistically significant (p < 0.001). When comparing mean pain scores between counter-pressure and effleurage groups the differences were not statistically significant either at baseline assessment or after intervention (p>0.05). Conclusion: counter- pressure and effleurage massages are effective non-pharmacological measures in reducing labor pain. Recommendation: Utilizing such simple and effective pain relief strategies by nurses and midwives should be encouraged.

Research topics

  • Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/ejhc.2021.190770

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.