MARATTO

article · International Egyptian Journal of Nursing Sciences and Research

Effect of Coffee Intake on Post-Dural Puncture Headache Parameters among Post-Cesarean Section Women

Abstract

Context: Coffee intake is one of the strategies developed to relief post dural puncture headache (PDPH). It is considered a safe choice for many post-cesarean section women. Aim: This study aimed to examine the effect of coffee intake on post-dural puncture headache parameters among post-cesarean section women. Methods: A quasi-experimental (time series) design was adopted. A convenience sample of 166 post-caesarean section women were recruited. This study was conducted at postpartum department at El-Manial University hospital, Cairo governorate, Egypt. Data were collected using two tools: Structured interview schedule and post-dural puncture headache assessment tool. Results: Concerning incidence of PDPH the study findings revealed that, 71.1%, 53.0%, and 27.7% of the study group suffering from PDPH at first, second, and third evaluation respectively as compared to 100.0%, 96.4%, and 92.8% of the control group. The mean PDPH severity of the study group was documented at 4.4±1.7, 3.1±1.0, and 1.1±0.5 at first, second, and third evaluation respectively while for the control group it was documented at 8.3±2.7, 7.5±2.6, and 6.8±1.5. Regarding analgesic need, it was significantly lower in the study as compared to the control at first, second, and third evaluation (63.6%, 12.7% and 7.2% vs. 86.7%, 61.3% and 56.4% respectively). Conclusion: There were statistically significant differences in favor of the study group compared to the control in relation to three parameters of PDPH i.e., incidence, severity, and analgesics need (p < 0.001). Recommendation: Coffee intake could be used by midwifery nurses as a non-pharmacological method to manage PDPH among post-cesarean section women

Research topics

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/ejnsr.2023.185471.1281

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.