MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Effect of biopolymer structure on uranium sorption by superabsorbent hydrogels based on CMC/guar gum

2026Open accessSinai University

Abstract

Nuclear power provides critical carbon-free energy, while sustainable uranium recycling enhances resource efficiency and reduces waste, requiring advanced selective recovery materials. Herein, superabsorbent hydrogels based on carboxymethyl-cellulose (F-CMC) and guar gum (F-GG) were synthesized via free-radical polymerization. The physicochemical properties were characterized via CHN, SEM, FTIR, TG/DTA, zeta potential, BET surface area analysis, EDX, and swelling properties. Their uranium (UO₂2⁺) sorption was evaluated in slightly acidic solutions (optimal pH0: 4.0), with F-CMC exhibiting superior capacity (269.26 mg/g, ≈1.131 mmol/g) compared to F-GG (⁓169.38 mg/g, ≈0.712 mmol/g). Sorption isotherms followed Langmuir model, reaching equilibrium in 120 min, with pseudo-first-order kinetics, indicating a combined mechanism of ion-exchange and chelation rather than simple diffusion. The SEM micrographs reveal that F-CMC exhibits surface roughening and granular deposits after sorption, whereas F-GG shows pore filling accompanied by aggregation. Thermodynamic analysis confirmed the process was spontaneous, entropy-driven, and exothermic. Regeneration using 0.25 M NaHCO₃ (or 0.2 M HCl) achieved near-complete uranium desorption and retained ≈80% efficiency over 5 cycles, demonstrating good stability and reusability. Finally, both sorbents effectively recovered U(VI) from acidic El-Sella ore leachates, with F-CMC achieving 0.807 mmol/g and F-GG achieving 0.609 mmol/g, the latter demonstrating superior selectivity in the the complex, multi-ion matrix. The EDX analysis confirmed F-CMC’s superior UO₂2⁺ sorption, dominated by K⁺/UO₂2⁺ ion-exchange and Al/U co-sorption, whereas F-GG exhibited lower capacity due to competitive Ca2⁺ interference.

Research topics

  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Covalent Organic Framework Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-46963-3

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.