MARATTO

article · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

Economic Evaluation of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia in South Africa

Abstract

Zanubrutinib may be a cost-saving and clinically superior treatment option for both untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL compared to ibrutinib in South Africa's public healthcare system. Its dominance is driven by lower acquisition and adverse event costs, paired with favourable survival and quality-of-life outcomes. Acalabrutinib may also represent a cost-effective alternative compared to ibrutinib, providing meaningful clinical benefit at acceptable additional cost. These results support the prioritisation of zanubrutinib for public sector access and reimbursement, while highlighting acalabrutinib's value in selected patient scenarios.

Research topics

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s40258-026-01031-9

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.