MARATTO

article · Suez Canal University Medical Journal

E-portfolio in Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University: Perceptions of Students and Mentors

2024Open accessSuez Canal University

Abstract

Background: E-portfolio is one of the most significant innovations in educational technology and medical education. It allows students to exhibit their development in a variety of knowledge and skills and eliminates most paper format drawbacks. Accordingly, the Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University shifted the paper format portfolio into e-portfolio in the preclinical years. Aim: To assess the students’ and mentors’ perceptions of using e-portfolio at the Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University. Subjects and Methods: This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design during the academic year 2021-2022. Students' and mentors' perceptions questionnaires were designed and distributed online at the end of the second semester to a comprehensive sample of year 2 students and the e-portfolio mentors (n=512 & 40 respectively). Results: About one-third of students and mentors agreed that the guidance on dealing with e-portfolio was excellent. 43.4% of the students asserted that the e-portfolio was a time saver and decreased their study burden. They asserted that e-portfolio increased their communication and computer skills and gave them new ways of presenting their work (60.9%, 48.5%, and 76.5% respectively). 76.3 % of mentors stated that e-portfolio minimizes the workload and time consumption. 57.5% of students had very successful experiences with e-portfolio. 84.2% of mentors asserted their satisfaction regarding the new experience with the e-portfolio. Conclusion: The overall responses of the students and mentors were in favor of positive perceptions towards the e-portfolio. However, there is a need for frequent guidance and training, and continuous technical support.

Research topics

  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Innovations in Medical Education

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2024.382090

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.